Archive

Archive for the ‘Business’ Category

Antispam KeyCAPTCHA.com Email Spam

September 26, 2011 3 comments

We Are on KeyCAPTCHA.com's Mailing List

We Are on KeyCAPTCHA.com's Mailing List (Credit to michellehenry.fr)

.

This is funny.

Professional spammers and blackhat profiteers openly boast that they own  KeyCAPTCHA.com antispam protection.

.

It was an open secret for a very long time  that its support@keycaptcha.com is in list of known spammers (difficult or impossible to unsubscribe from a service once subscribed) as well as there were reports that KeyCAPTCHA.com’s antispam protection collects Emails.. .

.

I’ve got a 3d-party Email confirming this (I leave contacts as they are publicly available on the internet)

From:  gloria<at>gloriarand.com
  to Gennady <Censored@gmail.com>
date Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:07 PM
subject Fwd: Changes in KeyCAPTCHA Terms of Service
.

Check out this email I got today. I don’t recall signing up for their service.

Gloria

Gloria Rand
SEO Copywriter & Social Media Consultant
(786)942-8321
gloria@gloriarand.com
Turning Keywords into… Copy that Clicks!
Authorized 1&1 Hosting Affiliate
Follow me on Facebook
Follow me on LinkedIn
Follow me on Twitter
Read my blog

———- Original Message ———-
From: KeyCAPTCHA <support@keycaptcha.com>
To: gloria@gloriarand.com
Date: September 8, 2011 at 7:33 AM
Subject: Changes in KeyCAPTCHA Terms of Service

Dear Gloria,
We are pleased to inform you that now the KeyCAPTCHA Service will protect your website(s) against spam as well as it will provide you with the opportunity to earn money by ad displaying in KeyCAPTCHA at your website(s).
Please, get to know with the updated Terms of Service at www.keycaptcha.com

For more information on amount of your income, click here .

Ad displaying in KeyCAPTCHA at your website(s) will launch on September 12, 2011.
An advertisement in KeyCAPTCHA will be displayed if we have advertisers who are willing to advertise in KeyCAPTCHA at websites whose subject matter suits your website’s subject.

If for some reason you are reluctant to earn money by our service, and you are unwilling to display ads in KeyCAPTCHA at your website, you have to go to your website’s additional settings atwww.keycaptcha.com and turn off ad displaying in KeyCAPTCHA at your website.

We anticipate a long-term and fruitful collaboration.

Best regards,
KeyCAPTCHA

Related articles:

The Google+’s Nym Probe – Isn’t it a Scam to Change Agreements Unilaterally and Retroactively?

August 30, 2011 Leave a comment

"if you're not paying for something, you're not the customer; you're the product being sold" (Clik on the image to read)

"if you're not paying for something, you're not the customer; you're the product being sold" (Clik on the image to read)

.

. Update: Changed the title from initial
“I’ve Never Subscribed to either Buzz or Google+ but My Google Private Profiles ‘re Unilaterally and Retroactively  Published, then Dumped, Now Will Be Suspended?”

.

“The act of creating deliberately
confusing jargon
 and user-interfaces
which trick your users into sharing
more info about themselves than
they really want to”

Definition of Privacy Zuckering

.

It has become appallingly obvious that
our technology has exceeded our humanity.
~Albert Einstein

.

The evolution of sense is,
in a sense, the evolution of nonsense
~Vladimir Nabokov

.

.

After reading  the Stilgherrian’s “Right, Google, you stupid cunts, this is simply not on!”,
I’ve decided to write what have been bothering me for the very long time – that is, the ubiquitous internet practice of unilateral and retroactive changing of agreements.
And ,”naturally”, without any previous notice, with the notice about possible changes without any notice in the same ToS as well as  the big disclaimer part on waiving any guarantees or responsibilities

User agrees with ToS, while signing in, so it is the bi-lateral agreement. If s/he’s not likes conditions, he would not have subscribed.
But then s/he spends time, work, personal and business connections, acquires habits because he (presumable) trust to provider of an online service.
.
Read more by clicking here…

Lies, Big Lies and Statistics of KeyCAPTCHA Service Part 1 On the Amount of Protected Sites

August 18, 2011 Leave a comment

History of changes:

  • Aug 18, 2011
    published this post as password-protected
  • Sept 2, 2011
    KeyCAPTCHA Team changed password to on-line real-time statistics of KeyCAPTCHA services due to publication  http://www.shpargalko.ru/2011/09/01/keycaptcha-2
  • Nov 6, 2012 – out-dated (or useless without valid password) references and password protection of this article removed

Lies, Big Lies and Statistics on KeyCAPTCHA.com Service.

Part 1. The Claimed by KeyCAPTCHA.com Total Amount of Protected Sites and Those Available to Advertisers

KeyCAPTCHA.com has been misinforming before and CONTINUES to misinform its potential clients and all being involved (bloggers, writers, et al writing about it).

.

Fig.1 Screenshot of www.keycaptcha.com main webpage

Fig.1 Screenshot of http://www.keycaptcha.com main webpage

|

First, the ToS and descriptions on KeyCAPTCHA website are changing daily but on August 17, 2011, there is still no information whatsoever about availability of or how to use KeyCAPTCHA free of charge without any advertising.

.

KeyCAPTCHA.com continues to intermittently  (some times with, others without, at least, in my area, I checked from computers of 3 different ISPs)  serve the advertising links + advertising puzzle pictures  through its service.

Initially, on external forums ,  KeyCAPTCHA.com vehemently insisted  that there will be no more free option without advertising but after unpublishing of KeyCAPTCHA from WordPress.org (on 08/10/2011, republished on 08/16/2011),  KeyCAPTCHA.com asserted, without any corresponding changes in ToS or texts on its web site,  that absence of free non-ads option was lie.

KeyCAPTCHA probably does not feed advertising (link + puzzle pictures) to visitors outside of Russia  because it doesn’t yet have  any advertisers interested in markets/audience ads  outside of Russia. 

See more in my previous article :
If Interested in a Free Service, then Don’t Promote it?

The web site keycaptcha.com (reproduced in screenshot on Fig.1 for the case that it would be changed) misinforms that the network of websites using KeyCAPTCHA and available to advertisers amounts to 15, 000 sites by 13,000 webmasters.

But statistics shows that amount of sites protected by KeyCAPTCHA are <650 and of users <3400 (but really less because discontinuations are not accounted)

Table 1. (Accounts , Sites ) -Summarized - by months

Table 1. (Accounts , Sites ) -Summarized - by months

One can directly open summarized by month incremental  numbers of new/added/registered SITES +  users/accounts Table 1 by clicking this link (Update: the link is removed since there is now no access)

Fig.1. (Accounts , Sites ) -Summarized - by months

Fig.1. (Accounts , Sites ) -Summarized - by months

.

Or, otherwise, from the main  interface
(Update: detailed instructions of using stats were removed removed since there is now no access)

.

Note that the real amounts is smaller the traced ones since the stats is accumulative. The same site can be added – removed from KeyCAPTCHA service  multiple times (or  be just removed) but stats increases  (reflects the adding of sites only)

.

The number of users is more than amount of  the sites because:

  • it is possible to register without adding sites for protection
  • Even more, until recently, it was impossible even to access the most essential introductory info on KeyCAPTCHA without registering
  • It is impossible to unregister from keycaptcha.com
  • The most of those registered never come back.
.
.Update: The amount of protected sites is not informative by itself. The advertisers are interested in the amount of sites whose owners agreed to serve advertising.   And those are just 2-3% .

Independent Stats Showing the Decreasing Trend of Amount of Sites on Drupal Using KeyCAPTCHA. Note it is real-time final values (not irreversible incrementally added as in prev stats)

.

Fig 1. Weekly Usage of KeyCAPTCHA on Drupal Sites (Diagram)

Fig 1. Weekly Usage of KeyCAPTCHA on Drupal Sites (Diagram)

.

.

Table 1. Weekly Usage of KeyCAPTCHA on Drupal Sites

.
These are screenshots taken from http://drupal.org/project/usage/keycaptcha
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

If Interested in a Free Service, then Don’t Promote it?

August 16, 2011 2 comments

.

Half the work that is done in this world
is to make things appear what they are not
~Beadle, E. R.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic
~Arthur C. Clarke’s 3d Law of Prediction)

But magic can sometimes just be an illusion
~Javan

Belief in the absence of illusions is itself an illusion
~Barbara Harrison

A hallucination is a fact, not an error;
what is erroneous is a judgment based upon it
~Bertrand Russell   

 

       So, after a storm of angry publications by unhappy webmasters and uninstalls of KeyCAPTCHA plugings, on August 14, 2011, KeyCAPTCHA.com “announced” (by posting a few replies, for example here and there) that the free of charge option of its  service was restored from August 8, 2011 (probably because the last post of KeyCAPTCHA defending its removal was from August 7, 2011, see the same links upward). Novosibirsk time (GMT +6:00)  everywhere in this article.

The most funny thing was that there were no changes in ToS or any descriptions on keycaptcha.com webite whatsoever! But wait, there’s more

How to Lie without being Caught-22 (Lessons Learned from Communicating with KeyCAPTCHA.com)

August 16, 2011 Leave a comment

Wisdom says that a liar should have a good memory. Not true on the internet,  it is enough to manage to change or remove your previous publications.

I and others caught KeyCAPTCHA.com, my former employer, to publicly lie hundreds times and you will not find any such publications.

From my observations, the posts on the forums based on WCMSs  (Web Content Management System)  like

usually let to change posts later, even after replies, whenever an author  likes.

While on

  • WordPress
  • Joomla (after being replied?)
  • IPB (aka IP.Board, InvsionPower Board) Services, how one should tag it in Social Media, I wonder?

do not (but only in a few minutes time immediately after posting) .

CSS Tutorials
What’s the point of permitting life-time changing (or deleting) what some has written, even after having dozens replies, I wonder?

One can check the forum’s CMS at the bottom of a web page and double-check it at webpage souce finding a string “generator”. Here is an example of HTML element from WordPress forum HTML-element:

  • <meta name=”generator” content=”WordPress 3.2″ />

What about comments in blogs and posts that cannot be edited/deleted?

That’s also simple. KeyCAPTCHA Team has done it many times. It is enough post personal  attacks on a participant the more and uglier the “better” until any sense is lost, then ask moderators, administrators/owner of the blog to delete the whole topic or branch for a flame and/or off-topic.

100% results of topic ensured to delete a thread, branch or a whole topic!

If the results are not immediate,  just return and do it again and again.

08/19/2011 Update: 

In Soviet Russia, spam activity of spam-captchas block human's access (We have detected spam activity, your actions are blocked)


Hilarious confirmation of this shit-technique employed by KeyCAPTCHA itself.
Read all thread!

“We have detected spam activity, your actions are blocked”

In Soviet Russia, spam activity of spam-captchas block human’s  access 

Another technique is to block writers (blog commenters) through its KeyCAPTCHA by IP-address.

This is very clever to self-advertise you, only fans of KeyCAPTCHA and advertising will be able to use internet soon.

How I was KeyCAPTCHAured: a Story of Scammed KeyCAPTCHA.com Ex-Employee

July 15, 2011 Leave a comment
Muck and KeyCAPTCHA Go Together

His business, his website, his KeyCAPTCHA - what about users and employees?

.

“If u are not paying for it,
you’re not the customer;
you’re the product being sold”
~Andrew Lewis

.

I am a former “employee” of KeyCAPTCHA.com “company”, having worked for it since 11 Dec, 2010 till May, 2011.

I believe that users of KeyCAPTCHA.com external antispam service will be better informed if they know my story of relations with persons providing KeyCAPTCHA service

.

But wait, there’s more

Debunking KeyCAPTCHA Myths (3d-party publications)

July 15, 2011 1 comment

It’s non-marketed (non-paid, non-promoted and often deleted at request of KeyCAPTCHA Team) point of view  on keycaptcha.com services.

Judge yourself.
I am only citing the publications of others (to which I have no relation or involvement) or easily verifiable on the internet data.
I even do not publish my info on keycaptcha.com scams as insider (and former employee) of keycaptcha.com

Antispam KeyCAPTCHA.com is being reported as known spammer:

Keycaptcha Plug-in Unpublished from Joomla Extension Directory for Fraud

Keycaptcha Unpublished from JED (oomla Extension Directory) for Fraud

KeyCAPTCHA plugin contribution is unpublished from:

It is not true that KeyCAPTCHA is unbreakable by bots,

as it is being affirmed by keycaptcha.com marketing publications, it is just not being hacked on unpopular web resources. Tthere are hundred of publications debunking KeyCAPTCHA’s invincibility:

KeyCAPTCHA being Uninstalled and Replaced by Other Antispam Solution(s) on hundreds webresources due its to technical or usability problems:

Source: http://twitter.com/#!/luxEffect/status/79158049574617088

  • etc.
.

Non-Usability & User Un-Friendliness of Interactive CAPTCHAs

No support of the blind users. 
And interactive captchas cannot support the blind.
Might be this is my lie and slander but I could not find any publications proving the opposite.
.
Users’ feedbacks about KeyCAPTCHA:

LOL:

“I love puzzles. I made 9 accounts!”
Cited from:  http://ww.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/exa5e/i_think_this_is_genius_but_i_cant_be_certain/c1boo5w

“What a size!!!” (exclamation of a girl picture taken from keycaptcha.com website)
Cited from: http://joomlaforum.ru/index.php?PHPSESSID=7df383cdc3a55a15eef9216adcc90064&topic=138180.msg752789#msg752789

Gennady
former KeyCAPTCHA Team member
caught by police in cooperation with my former employer (KeyCAPTCHA.com Team) for receiving my salary qualified as extortion

InvisionPower.com Joins Association of Black Employers. I Just Wanted to Tell you, How I Love You, IPS/IPB

August 22, 2002 2 comments
Update:

If you are curious about the strange date of this article,
please read my:

Shocked to Find that an Article Can Be Published with Any Date Irrespectively on the Time of Its Creation (Authorship, BlackHat Web Scraping, SEO Ranking Problems?!)

.

.

KeyCAPTCHA Deceptive Descriptions  Distributed Through InvisiobPower Web Sites is Not IPS's Concernt (Not My Job)  Credit  funvideoworld.com

KeyCAPTCHA Deceptive Descriptions Distributed Through InvisiobPower Web Sites is Not IPS's Concernt (Not My Job) Credit funvideoworld.com

. Relativity applies to to physics, not ethics
~Albert Einstein

.

.

To avoid the flame and off-topic in public forums, , I tried to privately report on intentional fraudulent misinformation published by anti-spam KeyCAPTCHA.com on Invision Power Services site My private communication (in password protected) ticket WAS SHARED WITH ABUSER (BTW, currently bullying and sueing me criminally my ex-employer KeyCAPTCHA.com), click and  see the excerpt below in red. So, I have a few questions:

  • What is the sense to block 3d party posts, opinions, reports, feedback on websites ? How can such information, software provided by InvisionPower Services Inc. be trusted if any critics is blocked and ignored?
  • Is it ethical to allude in password protected private communication and then to copy it to abuser?

But wait, there’s more

Shocked to Find that an Article Can Be Published with Any Date Irrespectively on the Time of Its Creation (Authorship, BlackHat Web Scraping, SEO Ranking Problems?!)

July 10, 2001 Leave a comment

This post is really created on Sept 15, 2011
but WordPress permits to change publication date

Isn’t it confusing for priority authorship disputes as well as for determining who webscraped, stole?

Note that the link of article still shows:

  • http://keycaptchaured.wordpress.com/2011/07/10/private-testing-the-link-generation-and-public-visibility-of-wp-com-blog-article-during-status-updatespending-review-draft-with-public-visibility

i.e. Jul 10, 2011, the date of I indicated during 1st publishing which I later changed to Jul 10, 2001 while I created it on Sept 15, 2011

Now it is published with

  • Status: Published
    Other choices I’ve tested:
    Published – Pending Review – Draft
  • Visibility: Public
    Other choices I’ve tested:
    Public – Password Protected – Private
History of changes:
  • Initial title:

    Testing Link Generation and Public Visibility of WP.com Blog Post During Status (Published – Pending Review – Draft) and Visibility (Public – Password Protected – Private)